CSI Part II: The money changers won’t change a thing


After weeks of bird-dogging Governor Mark Dayton and community “leaders” to show us the elusive $26 million proposal sent to him by a small fraternity of men, nothing has been released. More troubling, we hear the governor is considering approving the proposal.

Our calls for transparency have been met with complete radio silence. Yet, we did receive what is said to be a leaked copy of the proposal (see copy below).

The 27-page proposal starts with something true and ends with something false. The truth is that we urgently need investment into developing new structures in the black community. Our community’s unique disparities are well documented and warrant a plan with real solutions.

But it’s false that the proposal authored by a select circle of men (women, as usual, were relegated to peripheral roles in this male power grab) represents an honest attempt to address our issues. Nothing proves that more than the super secretive way in which the plan was put together. And, to be frank, some of the names attached to this proposal have long histories of hustling, not helping.

CSI on a bigger scale

The recent breakup between the Minneapolis Public Schools and the Community Standards Initiative brought the issue of backroom dealing into focus and painted an ugly picture of how our “leaders” get so intoxicated by personal interest that they forget the mission is to serve our people.

If there is $26 million to be had for the purpose of improving black lives, we need it. But not as a result of a handful of intermediaries seeking to enrich themselves (or the handful of legitimate individuals they have enticed into participating). The investment must have a transparent and competitive process that allows for all the agencies, programs, and individuals in our community to have a fair shot at gaining scarce resources.

The Black Advocates for Education began as a response to the lackluster investment Minneapolis Public Schools was making into their efforts to improve outcomes for black males. The district earmarked only $200,000 for the effort, but gave $375,000 to the CSI. We were outraged by the weak funding for real programs, and the larger allocation for a political vanity project. We demanded the district find at least $1 million for their Office of Black Male Student Achievement. Now we have word that the district will attempt to do just that, if they can find the money. That’s progress.

So, our question is why would there be a $26 million plan that would include absolutely nothing for this effort? Not even $1 million out of the total to support it. If you search the names of the 11 men who stand to gain millions under the plan you will find several who have never achieved results for our people, yet the current proposal would pay them before funding something critical like the effort to save black males in the public schools.


New leaders, better outcomes

We need a paradigm shift that deconstructs the nonprofit industrial complex which in many ways is a middle-class jobs program for professional activists and public administrators of public and philanthropic funds.

And, we need white politicians and funders to stop doing the politically expedient thing. They need to stop choosing our leaders for us, and stop using middlemen to buy the community. They must realize little has changed under the tenure of the current names associated with this proposal. Doubling down on these individuals as the chiefs of our community is a fool’s investment.

CSI should be the final testament in a long book about no-bid, non-competitive processes that continuously feed a few barons, but rob our people of the resources they need to truly improve the direction of our community. We need a plan with real metrics and measurable outcomes. We need to know there will be some accountability beyond the high hopes written into the current plan.

And we need a plan that breaks the cycle of poverty pimping, not continues it. Our stance is firm: no more business as usual.

In a recent city council meeting one Northside city council member said “there are a lot of people doing work in north Minneapolis, getting a paycheck, patting themselves on their back because they’re doing the right thing. But it doesn’t trickle down, and the superstructure, the infrastructure, does not represent that community.”

We agree. Now is the time to end the game of sloppily written money-seeking proposals and strive for real progress. That starts with transparency and real leadership, two things the current proposal lacks.


Community Proposals for to Gov. Mark Dayton

Let’s flog the system, not parents


Minneapolis’ superintendent of public schools is fond of saying we should send her kids who are well-rested, well-fed, and “ready to learn.” She strikes a Victorian tone when she talks about the number of absences students have, how it impacts their education, and how it tanks school performance.

She’s not alone in viewing parents and families in terms of their deficits.

A recent visit to Lucy Laney K-8 school prompted a Northside “leader” to post a message that called for a return to days where parents could be punished with public floggings.


For the record, BAE does not support public beatings for parents when their children are late to school. We don’t condone private beatings either. Violence against women is always wrong.

It’s true that some parents and students behave in ways that are challenging for schools. It’s also true that schools are a hot mess and failing even the students who show up each day “ready to learn.”

Black children who attend Minneapolis’ public schools experience many compounding in-school inequities that could be corrected if district and community leaders had the political will to accept responsibility for their system. We can’t blame parents until the system (and all its $100,000 salaried personnel) do their job.

For instance, on a recent visit to Lucy Laney BAE members learned that their students have been complaining about being hungry after lunch. When their principal looked into changes in their lunch program she found out that district nutritional guidelines call for a range of food portions, not hard rules for how much kids get to eat. But the enormous red flag of inequity was that Laney students, who are among the poorest in the district, get portions in the low end of the range.

Her 8th graders are eating kindergartner sized meals. Let that sink in: poor black children are getting less to eat than middle-class white kids.

Who do we flog publicly for that one? Which part of poor parenting can we blame for schools that feed rich kids better than poor?

If you need other examples, here are a few:

Suspensions and the criminalization of young black, brown, and American Indian students is persistent enough in MPS to trigger an investigation with civil rights officials in the Department of Education.

Special education is so bad for black students in the district that the Federal government took notice. The finding? Black students here are identified as behavioral disordered at a rate three time higher than black students nationally. According to the Star Tribune the rate is “higher than any other state in the country, according to the most recent federal data available.

And, there are problems with how MPS allocated the most precious resource: teachers. Research shows that teachers have a great impact on student behavior and learning. Yet, in MPS the distribution of quality teachers is one more way the system fails to live up to its rhetoric about “equity.”

report from the University of Minnesota concluded 10 years ago that teachers in classrooms with the highest number of low income students of color were paid less than teachers with the whitest classrooms. MinnPost followed up on the story this year and found disparities in teacher salaries from poor school to wealthy schools persist:

…a MinnPost analysis of 2012-2013 MPS salary data shows the teachers with the highest salaries clustered in the wealthiest, whitest schools. These are the teachers with the most experience and the most advanced degrees. Meanwhile the lowest paid, least experienced are concentrated in the district’s most challenged schools.

We know classroom instruction is the most important in-school contributor to student achievement. So why is the school system cheating the students most in need of great teachers?

At the high school level black students are in schools with the fewest course offerings. For instance, South and Southwest High Schools have well over 230 unique course offerings. North High School has 88. Please remember that when politicians come kissing babies, shaking hands, and proclaiming how much they love the Northside. Some times the “equity agenda” they speak of does not exist in their policy making.

See for yourself:


These types of systemic issues put children behind. The best behaved, well-rested children with the ideal parents would be impacted by a public education system that gives them less of everything needed to produce high levels of learning.

So, while it may be tempting to pull out the old world maternalism of a superintendent who channels Mary Poppins when speaking of our children (calling for them to be suitable for schools rather than the other way around), or the get-off-my-lawn paternalism of well-fed suburbanite community “leaders” who lord over inner-city programs and advocate classist violence against the stereotypes of urban black mothers, let’s consider focusing on ensuring the school system taxpayers fund is not so incompetent as to compound societies inequities rather than mitigate them.

Lucy Laney is a great school to consider all the ways in which a district can pile on the discrimination. Kids there have less access to the best paid, most effective teachers. They’ve get assigned students in a pattern that makes the schools more segregated and full of students with challenges. They even get fed less.

None of those problems are caused by parents or students.

At the end of the day these “leaders” earn nearly $200,000 annually. That comes from government and philanthropy. At very least we can expect more than rhetoric from them that blame shifts while entire systems misfire.

It’s just a thought.

Bernadeia Johnson: Teachers in struggling schools have the lowest average performance


A communication from Bernadeia Johnson to Minneapolis Public School teachers informs them of a pending story in the Star Tribune that might show teachers in struggling schools have the lowest average performance. The implications are huge.

For years MPS has endured battles of equity among competing school constituencies, with those in wealthier parts of town accused of using politics to gain advantages for their schools. This includes the ability to get poor performing teachers removed. Those teachers are suspected to end up in poorer schools where the political power of parents is routinely defeated by district brass.

The revelation that Minneapolis may be housing its least effective teachers in schools with high populations of poor children of color follows national research that shows students who need the best teachers often get the least effective their districts have to offer.

To that end a study from the Center for American Progress has found that the “data confirms previous findings—in many places, poor children and children of color are less likely to be taught by a highly effective teacher.”

Here is Johnson’s letter to teachers:


I believe one of the most critical factors in improving student achievement is through the continued development of our teaching force. You are doing the highest-impact work in Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS), and it is my job to ensure that you have the tools and resources you need to excel in your role.

I want you to be aware that the Star Tribune recently requested and received aggregate teacher evaluation data. We are required by the Minnesota Data Practices Act to comply with the data request.

MPS’ General Counsel was in communication with attorneys from the Minneapolis Federation of Teachers (MFT) to determine the level of information that we were required to release in accordance with state law.

We expect the Star Tribune to publish its story in this Sunday’s paper.

I know you are working extremely hard to prepare our students for their futures. Teaching is a selfless profession that takes heart and demands greatness, and you deserve credit for choosing to dedicate your lives to our students. We all know that a strong education is a gateway to infinite possibilities. I visit many classrooms throughout the school year, and I am inspired by your quality work and commitment to our students’ futures.

Our interest is to support you to be the best possible teacher you can be. Throughout the data request process, we made it a priority to protect our teachers’ privacy. I want to be clear that individual teachers cannot be identified in the data, and that only school-level data was provided to the Star Tribune.

 The data provided to the Star Tribune represent information generated for school reporting purposes from Standards of Effective Instruction (SOEI) observations and student surveys. These reports, along with school-level aggregate value-added data, represent a good-faith effort to fulfill the Star Tribune’s data request.

It is my understanding that the newspaper may publish a map that displays average teacher performance by school, which will show that schools in high-poverty areas have lower average teacher performance.

 This type of map does not accurately reflect the diversity in skill and performance of our teachers. The story will likely include the status and significance of teacher evaluation at state and national levels.

The newspaper does not represent MPS’ interests or my personal views, so I want you to hear from me about why our teacher evaluation system is important to the success of our teachers and students.

The system is one of several components needed to make the appropriate systemic changes to accelerate growth, but more importantly, it’s in place to support all of you. The teacher evaluation system helps us:
· Identify teachers who are making significant gains with all of our students, especially our lowest-performing students so that we can learn about and replicate your practices.

It also helps us identify teachers who are not making gains with students;
· Give you meaningful feedback to strengthen your teaching and provide you with targeted professional development to support your professional growth;
· Recruit highly-effective teachers to coach and mentor colleagues; and
· Build stronger and more effective teacher teams and schools

I hear from many of you that you welcome the opportunity to develop and strengthen your skills. You take pride in your work, and you want to be the best teacher possible for your students. This is the type of mindset and expectation I have of all of our teachers.

 On occasion, there are teachers who struggle, and we provide help for them to improve or transition them out of the profession.
Many MPS teachers have been involved in the creation and implementation of our teacher evaluation system. We couldn’t have built this system without your engagement and input.

As with any big system change, we continually adjust and improve the system to ensure it is beneficial to teachers, leaders and ultimately, our students. I appreciate hearing from teachers about this system’s successes and challenges.
Thank you for choosing Minneapolis Public Schools as the place to make a difference in the lives of students—they deserve you.

 Bernadeia Johnson.

Why are our “leaders” stonewalling questions about their $26 million payday?


Last week we saw some political theater at the state capital.

Senator Jeff Hayden faced questions about his alleged involvement in pressuring the Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS) into signing a $375,000 no-bid contract with the Community Standards Initiative (or CSI for short).

The Senate Ethics Committee, consisting of two Democrats and two Republicans, did not reach a conclusion about Hayden’s potential ethics violations. Instead, they punted the issue to a second hearing set for November 5th.

Between now and then people will be wondering if MPS Superintendent Bernadeia Johnson will finally go on record to confirm the stories that she was bullied by Senators Jeff Hayden and Bobby Champion.

So far she has been evasive about the matter in public. We hope she finds her voice and her courage to tell the truth about what happened. Other women in the black community and beyond will likely applaud if she becomes one of the few to stand up to the old boys club.


While the original CSI contract is bruising the reputations of leaders at all levels, as BAE reported last week, it’s just the tip of the iceberg in identifying ways in which public dollars meant for ‘the many’ are being distributed into the hands of ‘the few.” While following the money trails, BAE leaders discovered that many of the same individuals, who were involved in CSI, are also involved in what we are calling CSI II.

CSI II, the backroom attempt to draw $26 million of state money to a select group of politically connected godfathers aided by Senators Hayden and Champion, is a clear signal that it is time to rethink who leads us, and how they do it.

One key question that we should be asking as concerned taxpayers is: Why hasn’t the $26 million proposal that was submitted to Governor Dayton’s office been made public?

Some of the designers of the proposal are professional protesters with histories of hijacking processes by claiming community members have not been engaged; so why would they create a plan for the black community without vetting it with the black community and obtaining input?

Now that BAE has raised the issue we’ve been contacted by various “leaders” who wonder why we’re making this all public. They want to talk with us privately to see if we can reach some sort of understanding (even after one of them went on black radio to make incoherent charges about our integrity).

That shows they still don’t get it. We’re not interested in business as usual.

The old leadership model involves a small circle of men, many of who live outside of North Minneapolis and most of who act as gatekeepers for power and they bottleneck the flow of resources aimed at improving the lives of people in North Minneapolis. Women and other leaders who actually live and work in North Minneapolis are expected to sit with a subservient posture in the leadership’s second string, if at all.

They are to be seen, not heard.

No more.

We must remember the fact that underlying conditions for our families and children are not improving under this faulty leadership. Our most vulnerable community members continue to suffer under the weight of oppression through virtually nonexistent economic and employment opportunities, inadequate access to quality education, and police abuse within the city of Minneapolis. CSI and CSI Part II are only the latest episodes after several decades of questionable proposals that were hastily constructed and poorly executed once funded.

Given that history, and the great needs of our community, we can only accept leadership that values community voice, accountability, and transparency. We are ready for a change. We are tired of the status quo. We are the leaders that we have been waiting for.

So who is willing to stand with us?

The shady CSI deal was just the tip of the iceberg


Those of us that formed Black Advocates for Education did so because we were tired of lackluster investments in strategies to improve the pitiful academic outcomes for black males in Minneapolis Public Schools. When we learned that the newly formed Office of Black Male Student Achievement was only allocated a budget of $200,000 we were livid. Given the enormous issues with black education in Minneapolis we thought the amount was absurd.

Then news broke about this crazy contract the district had signed with the Community Standards Initiative for over $375,000. Yes, the MPS signed an agreement with a virtually nonexistent organization instead of fully funding a district-wide strategy for systematically undoing the structures that impact student learning for black children.

Little did we know that was just the icing on a much larger cake. Here we were thinking this gross waste of hundreds of thousands of dollars was a big deal, when the deal was much bigger.

As it turns out, some of the same actors in the CSI public school debacle have been working on a much bigger payday. Community members have brought it to our attention that Senators Bobby Champion and Jeff Hayden have been working with “leaders” connected to the CSI to develop a plan that will draw $26 million in state funding. Let’s call it CSI part II, because once again there is a play by folks with questionable capacity, organizational skills, and histories to seek government money on behalf of people in the community, without input from the community.

That’s the game. It’s been happening at least since the 1970’s. North Minneapolis has it’s chiefs, all male and well-fed, most of whom live outside of the city, and all of whom profit from acting as gatekeepers. Meanwhile, as hundreds of millions of dollars are spent in the name of improving the lives of real people, conditions haven’t changed.

We’re not OK with that. Our children matter and they deserve better. The many people who get up every morning and actually do good work for families that need help deserve better. Of course we want strong investments in our community. And, we want those investments to have a reasonable chance for making a difference.

It won’t happen as long as we allow yesterday’s leaders to continue negotiating deals about us, without us.

Brave community members sent the letter below  to Gov. Dayton today. It asks for a transparent process to bring resources into the black community.

If you agree, feel free to write him too.

Speaking truth, demanding change

BAE leader Nekima Levy-Pounds spoke the truth to the Minneapolis School Board tonight, calling them out for giving away $357,000 in a no-bid contract on the buddy system and leaving children behind. This district underserves its poorest schools, even thought it spends $21,000 per child on a miseducation.

“We’re sick and tired of being sick and tired,” Nekima said.

We all agree.

Professor Nekima Levy-Pounds speaks truth the Minneapolis School Board – Oct. 14, 2014 from D.A. Bullock on Vimeo.

Exposing Jim Crow, Jr. in Minneapolis Public Schools

The data in Minneapolis speaks for itself. Less than half of the black males in Minneapolis graduate on time. Far fewer are proficient or ready for post school life. Some schools in Minneapolis are without a single proficient black student. This human catastrophe is happening in one of the wealthiest, and most college-educated states in the union. Right under the nose of liberal mecca, racialized outcomes for people of color are insufferable.

Enter BAE. We’ve had enough. And our leaders continue to side with the powers that be rather than the power of we. When news broke recently that our leaders on every level were involved in a questionable boondoogle involving a $375,000 no-bid contract granted to a non-existent community partner, we were done.

We are sick and tire. Our children need justice. We must be the tip of the spear.

So, last night we jammed up our “leader’s” twitter handles.

To see how it went down, click here.